The Blue Angel (1930) directed by Josef von Sternberg is a
tragedy. The film is based on the novel,
Professor Unrat by Heinrich
Mann. It is about an existential,
economic, and social downfall of a man, who foolishly risks everything he had
for a fleeting desire for one woman.
The man, Prof. Dr. Immanuel Rath (why am I thinking of
Immanuel Kant?) is played brilliantly by Emil Jannings and the woman for whom
he hopelessly falls, Lola Lola is played by Marlene Dietrich. The role of Lola Lola propelled Dietrich into
stardom that was inevitably bound for Hollywood .
Professor Rath (mocked by his students with a name
“Professor Unrat” meaning “professor garbage”) has a teaching post at a local
gymnasium. He is a stern man, bent on
disciplining his pupils, while showing them value of Hamlet. But he lacks passion in every way. He deems himself far superior to others, both
intellectually and morally. He chooses a
road of “professorial celibacy,” an “intellectual asceticism” that does not
permit even one small thought about carnal pleasures. He scolds his male students for visiting the
local club, The Blue Angel and
engaging in lurid fantasies while watching Lola Lola perform.
Of course, this is all fine and good..until the professor
himself stumbles into the club and is smitten by Lola Lola. And who could not be smitten with Marlene
Dietrich? She is a presence on the
screen. She takes over with her raw,
aggressive, powerful masculinity and her piercing feminine eyes, which are just
as deadly.
Professor Rath wants to resist her but he keeps coming back.
His life begins to unravel and he is not himself. Rath wants to do an honorable thing—he
proposes to Lola Lola. She laughs and
laughs and laughs but still accepts his proposal. One does feel some kind of pity for Rath but
his passivity and lack of will power is more infuriating than pitiful.
Rath has been seduced not only by Lola Lola (which happened
almost instantly) but also by the attention he has been receiving from
her. She treats him with amusement, and
yet he, the man of the intellect, cannot see the utter indignity of it
all. He becomes a child in relation to
Lola Lola who happily acquiesces to anything she says. His will was never existent, and Lola Lola
does not even have to demand anything of him.
She has already won the battle by merely sitting next to him. Rath, just like with his students, is
existentially impotent and anything and anyone has more power than him.
This is a dark film. It is not a film to watch if you want to
be entertained, despite the fact that plot moves with a pace that calls on you
to continue watching.
The imagery is exquisite in its symbolism—a dead bird at the
beginning of the film, that “never sang anyway,” a professor imitating a rooster,
a professor becoming a clown, among others—all are part of the strength of this
film.
Jannings’ performance is near perfection, if not
perfection. One is conflicted in
feelings whether to pity Rath or simply become increasingly frustrated with his
passivity, or in the end, be totally indifferent to him. Although not Jannings’ last film to be made,
it seems that this role was the pinnacle of his career. Sadly, he chose to stay in Germany
during the rise of Hitler, and in his support of Nazism, he even starred in
some Nazi propaganda films. This is in
contrast to Josef von Sternberg who was Jewish, and Dietrich who was very clear
in her outspoken rejection of Nazism.
![]() |
| Josef von Sternberg |
Despite this very disappointing fact, the film does not
belong to Jannings but if it belongs to anyone, it is Heinrich Mann for writing
the novel, and to Sternberg for directing the film. Loud voiced rejections of Nazi ideology by
Sternberg and Dietrich carry through any mixed emotions I might have that
oftentimes take over the artistic vision.



No comments:
Post a Comment